JACOBS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT

Large investment company experience. Personalized attention of a small boutique firm.

Home

QVM

Slide Presentation

Performance Data

Value Stock Podcast

Financial Planning

Jan 2010 Client Letter

August 2009 Client Letter

Feb 2009 Client Letter

Brochure and Supplement

Investor Safety Tips

Contact Information

January 20, 2010

 

Dear Client

Over the past several months the stock market has maintained the momentum that started from the depths of despair last March.  While we have all enjoyed the recovery, I find myself wondering if we have come too far, too fast.

Based on current earnings estimates for 2010, the market trades at just over the historical average of about 15x earnings.  On one hand, one can certainly make the argument that earnings are still "below trend," meaning that we are due for strong earnings growth as the economy rebounds.  On the other hand, analyst estimates are notoriously optimistic, suggesting that the market's real P/E multiple is well above the historical average.

My approach is not to worry so much about the market's overall valuation but rather to look for individual stocks that are attractive.  Quite frankly, with each passing month (and each uptick in stock prices) it gets harder to find really attractive stocks.  But consider the alternatives.  Government bonds yield little, and the spread over Treasurys for riskier bonds (including junk bonds) has fallen significantly over the past 10 months.  Money market returns are paltry.  As long as inflation remains low, I doubt we will see great fixed income opportunities.

So what does it all mean for stocks?  It probably means we should ratchet down our expectations somewhat.  The market has fallen in only one month since the lows in March, and that kind of steady move higher can't continue indefinitely.  Even as the economy gets better and companies start to report better results, I doubt the stock market will push higher with each piece of good news.  We are starting to see that with the early 4th quarter earnings.  Companies like IBM, JP Morgan and Intel (none of which I have bought for clients) have reported strong results, but the market has not rewarded the stocks.

Even as we expect lower returns for stocks, those returns should still be considerably better than the fixed income alternatives over time.  And with low inflation, even the lower returns I anticipate are still quite attractive on a real basis (i.e. once we adjust for inflation).

So have we come too far, too fast?  I don't think so.  The market fell a long way, so we had a long way to recover.  The best of that recovery may be over, but what is left should still help us build real long-term wealth.

 

Having complained about the difficulty of finding attractive stocks, I do want to mention a stock I purchased for many of you late last year.  UnitedHealth Group is the nation's largest health insurer, which puts it right in the middle of the health care reform debate. 

As the health care bill gained momentum, fears of a public health insurance option and various taxes knocked the stock down.  My approach to valuing the stock was first to consider the business ignoring the consequences of the potential new law.  What I found was a well-positioned insurer with both local scale (hugely important in health care) and national scale (pivotal for keeping costs down in this competitive business).  In addition, the poor economy and the H1N1 virus had led to weak margins in the industry.  But in insurance, weak margins usually lead to better results as underperforming capital leaves the industry.  So my view was that we had a financially strong company earning good returns in a difficult environment.  And the stock was trading at 8-9x EPS.

Of course, then I had to go back to adjust my valuation for health care reform.  I considered a range of outcomes based on what could reasonably be passed by Congress, fully understanding that I couldn't predict which outcome would win.  The worst outcome I could see for United (a public insurance option with a weak mandate that would encourage only the sick to get insurance) was bad, but it wouldn't bankrupt the company.  In fact, given its scale and operational strengths, United could ultimately do quite nicely in such an environment.  And that was the worst outcome.  Much better outcomes (for the industry, anyway) could include the whole thing falling apart.  Again, I don't want to predict political outcomes.  But it was a case of heads-we-win, tails-we-do-OK.  Put another way, I believe the risk-reward tradeoff was tilted in the stock's favor.  The stock has enjoyed mostly good political news since then, but things are far from settled.  Still, I am optimistic about the company's long-term prospects.

 

I have updated my Form ADV, which describes the business of Jacobs Investment Management in more detail.  I am obligated by law to offer annually to send it to you, and I would be happy to do so if you reply that you would like a copy.

For those of you with taxable accounts, a capital gains report for 2009 will be coming shortly.  Please call or email if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Bill Jacobs


Jacobs Investment Management

401 Church St., Suite 2500

Nashville, TN 37219

(615) 467-3360